Thursday, 27 September 2012

Vegas books: $300M+ changed hands with NFL call

LAS VEGAS (AP) ? Las Vegas oddsmakers say $300 million or more changed hands worldwide on a controversial referee call that decided the Monday Night Football game between the Green Bay Packers and the Seattle Seahawks.

Sports book chief Jay Kornegay said Tuesday that bettors at The LVH casino registered shock, some celebration, then anger when the outcome of the Packers game against the Seahawks was decided due to what he called "a blatant bad call."

The Seahawks won 14-12 after referees ruled that a Seattle receiver came down with the ball in a pile of bodies in the end zone.

Gambling expert RJ Bell of Las Vegas-based Pregame.com says he thinks two-thirds of bets worldwide were on the Packers, and that sports books took in at least $150 million because of the call.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2012-09-25-Replacement%20Officials-Gambling/id-9ce29c6dd5ab4d1eb788c2d2905cc171

lottery winners lottery winners april fools day pranks ohio state vs kansas daniel von bargen the beach blood diamond

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

National Hockey: Holders Haryana through to quarters

Bangalore, Sep 26

Defending champions Haryana drew 2-2 with Maharashtra to confirm their entry into the quarter-finals of the senior Men's National Hockey championship here Wednesday.

Haryana, who won their previous three league matches, thus topped Pool A with an unbeaten record. India stars Bharat Chikkara and Sardar Singh scored for Haryana while Maharashtra replied through Narad Bahadur and Irshad Mirza.

In Pool H, Association of Combined Universities, courtesy a last-gasp goal by Gurpreet Singh, drew 1-1 with Bihar while Sashastra Seema Dal opened their campaign with a 16-0 drubbing of Goa with Kishore Lakra scoring four goals.

Hosts Karnataka romped to a 21-0 win against Mizoram in a meaningless Pool B match that only showed up the huge disparity among teams.

The results:

Pool A: Haryana 2 (Bharat Chhikkara 1, Sardar Singh 1) drew with Maharashtra 2 (Narad Bahadur 1, Irshad Mirza 1).

Group B: Delhi 5 (Avatar Singh Mann 1, Pawan Singh Chouhan 2, Abhishek 1, Mohit 1) beat Himachal Pradesh 3 (Rajesh Kumar 1, Sarabjit Singh 1, Balram Kumar 1).

Karnataka 21 (K Laldintluanga (OG), SK Uthappa 3, Mohan Muthana 5, MK Mudappa 7, Somana KM 2, PL?Thimmanna 1, MB?Aiyappa 1, Nikin Thimmaiah 1) beat Mizoram 0.

Group D: Sashastra Seema Bal 14 (Pradeep Kumar Singh 3, Kishore Lakra 4, Ajit Singh 2, Joychandra Singh 1, Surchandra Singh 1, L Suresh Singh 1, Noacha Singh 1, Romi Kumar Singh 1) beat Goa 0.

Pool H: Manipur 16 (Jayant Kumar 4, Chittaranjan Singh 3, Ganbama 2, Romen Singh 2, Hera Singh 1, Amarjit Singh 1, Kiran Kumar Singh 1, Abung Singh 1, Dayananda Singh 1) beat Andaman and Nicobar 0.

Bihar 1 (Mohd Riazuddin 1) drew with Association of Indian Universities 1 (Gurpreet Singh 1).

Source: http://www.prokerala.com/news/articles/a330320.html

stations of the cross nike foamposite galaxy bill maher seabiscuit dingo nba all star weekend malin akerman

Remarks by Secretary of State Clinton to the UNAIDS Shared ...

?

SECRETARY CLINTON:Thank you. Thank you very much. Michel, thank you, and thank you for your years of leadership. President Yayi, thank you. Everywhere I go at the UN this week where there?s an important issue being discussed, the President is here on behalf of Benin and on behalf of the AU ? (applause) ? and we thank you so much, Mr. President. And thank you, Chairman Ping. Thank you for the work that you have done in raising the visibility and the importance of health-related issues at the African Union.

And good morning to all of you excellencies and ladies and gentlemen. It is such a pleasure for me to be here at this event to demonstrate very visibly America?s commitment to shared responsibility as we all work together toward a historic goal: creating an AIDS-free generation. It is an ambitious goal that we have set, but I know we can reach it. In part, that?s because of the commitment of every one of you and the many others you represent here today. I also know because of the investments that the United States and our partners have been making for decades to understand, prevent, and treat this disease.

But there?s another reason we can foresee an AIDS-free generation, and that is because nations are stepping up to their own responsibilities to care for their own people. Because ultimately, if we are going to win the fight against AIDS, the societies that are the hardest hit will have to lead the way. That?s why the United States, under the leadership of Dr. Eric Goosby, who is the head of our PEPFAR program and a long time physician who treated some of the very first AIDS patients in San Francisco, to an advocate and manager and champion of what we all can do together ? he and I have worked closely together in the Obama Administration to make country ownership a hallmark of PEPFAR and other health programs.

But let me be very clear: Country ownership is not code for abandoning our partners. We are continuing our support, but we are reshaping our programs in ways that make them more sustainable. We want to help our partners, all of you, help set priorities and get the capacity to manage resources, develop your own plans, implement them, and eventually fund them as well. Because in the end, there must be commitment from communities and from governments across the world.

I?m often asked by those who I serve with in the Obama Administration as well as colleagues in Congress, ?Tell me, are our partners really taking ownership of the fight against AIDS?? More and more I can say without hesitation the answer to that question is yes.

I can tell people about Namibia, which now provides half of the financing for its fight against HIV/AIDS. (Applause.) Dozens of doctors and nurses who used to be supported by PEPFAR or the Global Fund are now paid by and overseen by the Namibian Government. Soon many pharmacists and nurses will make this same transition, and I thank Namibia for its leadership.

I can also tell you about South Africa, where the government now accounts for about three quarters of all HIV/AIDS spending in the country. Under the new Partnership Framework that I signed when I was in Cape Town with the Health Minister of the Zuma Administration, South Africa will pay for nearly 90 percent of its HIV/AIDS response by 2017. So let me thank President Zuma and South Africa for their commitment and leadership.

Or I can tell you about Rwanda, which has taken over the management of treatment programs at 70 medical facilities, serving over 30,000 HIV-positive patients. And Rwanda?s increased ownership and capacity then helps to free up our resources to work with Rwanda to train local healthcare workers. That is a priority that Rwanda identified, and it?s one that we are very proud to help Rwanda meet.

So Namibia, South Africa, Rwanda; they are not alone. I could cite many more examples, including many of the countries represented here. But we know that change can be difficult, and some of our practices and habits go back decades. And so often in life it is easier to keep doing the same things the same old way. So when we talk about holding each other accountable, we are really agreeing to help each other overcome inertia, to make hard choices, to do the tough work of finding new ways to work together. And that, to me, is the message that I hope you will take with you, because we have to be more innovative, creative, and smart about the resources we have and how they can best be deployed.

So to that end, the United States is pilot-testing a scorecard that will allow us and our partners to assess our joint programs and progress in building sustainable, country-owned health programs, including our efforts to fight HIV/AIDS. And I know that the members of the AU, Dr. Ping, are undertaking your own efforts along similar lines. That is a great step forward if we are serious about shared responsibility, and we should work together to learn from each other so our efforts are complementary.

So the steps that you are discussing here today represent measurable progress, but to deliver on that promise, the promise of this moment, we have to maintain the progress and build on it. If every nation devastated by HIV follows the example of many of the leaders in this room and steps up to shared responsibility, we won?t just keep up our momentum; we will accelerate our progress and move even faster toward the day when we can announce the birth of an AIDS-free generation.

Thank you all very much. (Applause.)

Source: http://www.enewspf.com/latest-news/health-and-fitness/36881-remarks-by-secretary-of-state-clinton-to-the-unaids-shared-responsibility-event.html

charles addams pinewood derby cars republican debate tonight tinker tailor soldier spy rich forever rick ross project runway all stars elin nordegren

Wireless bands are old tech: For mobile's sake let's abandon them ...

Takeaway: Today?s wireless systems are mired in analogue legacy stretching back 100 years. Splitting the spectrum into bands is something that we can drop to great advantage.

Written in my Singapore hotel room and despatched to TechRepublic at 60Mbps over a wired LAN.

Digital signal processing has changed everything in our lives - from the cars we drive, the products we manufacture, and the way we communicate and calculate.

It has also given us the internet and mobile technology. Yet that wireless technology is still based on designs that evolved between 1915 and the 1970s.

A continual process of refinement and miniaturisation - technology polishing, if you will - got us to where we are today, with the added innovation of digital processing technology. But now we find ourselves at a watershed where new techniques are required for any really significant gains.

The use of bands - splitting up the spectrum into convenient chunks for radio, TV, citizens? use, police, cell phones and so on - could now be replaced by everyone using the same frequencies at the same time.

The interference problems that we would have suffered with analogue technology can now be overcome by digital coding and processing.

A physical analogy would be our ability to talk over the noise of a crowded cocktail party and yet hear nothing at all of the other conversations going on around us.

How is this facility possible for wireless systems? It is a bit of a challenge to explain, but here goes.

Figure 1 shows the analogue banding that separates the energy of one signal from another.

Figure 1. The analogue past of wireless bands. Image: Peter Cochrane/TechRepublic

Figure 1. The analogue past of wireless bands. Image: Peter Cochrane/TechRepublic

Figure 2 shows those bands removed and all the signals overlapping.

Figure 2. The digital future of wireless using codes. Image: Peter Cochrane/TechRepublic

Figure 2. The digital future of wireless using codes. Image: Peter Cochrane/TechRepublic

So how are they separated? They are separated by time and angle.

Why is this important? Looking to the future, we can expect an internet of mobile things far in excess of the mobile devices that humans own. These things will be fixed and mobile, long- and short-lived, and they will need to communicate with each other and networks.

The wireless technology of today will not do the job. We will need every ounce of bandwidth and every degree of signal separation we can muster. Removing bands, and spreading signals over a greater span will provide that facility.

If we had no radio systems at all and were starting with a clean sheet of paper, all these issues would pose no problem. But we don?t.

Legacy technology and investment

We have a huge investment and deployment of legacy technology and replacing the old with the new will take some considerable time.

However, there is some good news. The internet of things will mostly involve short-range communication at low power. The spectrum available for that type of communication is well above that used commercially today. It also offers more than 1,000 times the capacity.

Another perspective is the transition from a kW world with thousands of huge masts and big transmitter powers serving millions of radios and TVs, to thousands of mobile base stations at more modest powers measured in watts with millions of users, and then on to billions of mobile devices and things with billions of base stations at very low powers measured in mW and uW, operating over very short distances in continual and sporadic modes.

Figure 3. From megawatts, kilowatts and watts to millwatts and microwatts. Image: Peter Cochrane/TechRepublic

Figure 3. From megawatts, kilowatts and watts to millwatts and microwatts. Image: Peter Cochrane/TechRepublic

What happens after that? A migration of the spreading technology, one service band at a time, until the entire spectrum is covered. How long will the process take? Looking at the recent move from analogue to digital TV it could be as long as 20 years and as few as 10 or less once it starts.

After that we have nowhere to go. We have come to the end of the evolutionary road for wireless systems. Of course, added intelligence will be complemented by smart antennas and more processing power, but the basic technology cycle will be sealed.

The radio spectrum, in total, spreads over some 300GHz, but we have only used around 30GHz so far. Then, of course, there is free space optics, which is millions of times greater.

As we extend into the space above 30GHz, there is some really good news. Atmospheric absorption accelerates and communication over more than a few metres or hundreds of metres rapidly becomes impossible and the mutual interference problem dies away quickly.

This is ideal for the future we are building with billions of wireless devices, and we are working symbiotically with nature rather than trying to go in the opposite direction.

What does it all mean for you and me? Improvements in our lives and living, invisible and visible. How big a change?

I reckon it will be about the same size as the move we experienced from those first transistor radios to the internet - or perhaps even bigger.

Source: http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/cio-insights/wireless-bands-are-old-tech-for-mobiles-sake-lets-abandon-them/39749426

donnie mcclurkin whitney houston funeral live stream kevin costner whitney houston whitney houston funeral live pat buchanan slither slither

Intuitive visual control provides faster robot operation

ScienceDaily (Sep. 25, 2012) ? Using a novel method of integrating video technology and familiar control devices, a research team from Georgia Tech and the Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) is developing a technique to simplify remote control of robotic devices.

The researchers' aim is to enhance a human operator's ability to perform precise tasks using a multi-jointed robotic device such as an articulated mechanical arm. The new approach has been shown to be easier and faster than older methods, especially when the robot is controlled by an operator who is watching it in a video monitor.

Known as Uncalibrated Visual Servoing for Intuitive Human Guidance of Robots, the new method uses a special implementation of an existing vision-guided control method called visual servoing (VS). By applying visual-servoing technology in innovative ways, the researchers have constructed a robotic system that responds to human commands more directly and intuitively than older techniques.

"Our approach exploits 3-D video technology to let an operator guide a robotic device in ways that are more natural and time-saving, yet are still very precise," said Ai-Ping Hu, a GTRI senior research engineer who is leading the effort. "This capability could have numerous applications -- especially in situations where directly observing the robot's operation is hazardous or not possible -- including bomb disposal, handling of hazardous materials and search-and-rescue missions."

A paper on this technology was presented at the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation held in St. Paul, Minn.

For decades articulated robots have been used by industry to perform precision tasks such as welding vehicle seams or assembling electronics, Hu explained. The user develops a software program that enables the device to cycle through the required series of motions, using feedback from sensors built into the robot.

But such programming can be complex and time-consuming. The robot must typically be maneuvered joint by joint through the numerous actions required to complete a task. Moreover, such technology works only in a structured and unchanging environment, such as a factory assembly line, where spatial relationships are constant.

The Human Operator

In recent years, new techniques have enabled human operators to freely guide remote robots through unstructured and unfamiliar environments, to perform such challenging tasks as bomb disposal, Hu said. Operators have controlled the device in one of two ways: by "line of sight" -- direct user observation -- or by means of conventional, two-dimensional camera that is mounted on the robot to send back an image of both the robot and its target.

But humans guiding robots via either method face some of the same complexities that challenge those who program industrial robots, he added. Manipulating a remote robot into place is generally slow and laborious.

That's especially true when the operator must depend on the imprecise images provided by 2-D video feedback. Manipulating separate controls for each of the robot's multiple joint axes, users have only limited visual information to help them and must maneuver to the target by trial and error.

"Essentially, the user is trying to visualize and reconstruct a 3-D scenario from flat 2-D camera images," Hu said. "The process can become particularly confusing when operators are facing in a different direction from the robot and must mentally reorient themselves to try to distinguish right from left. It's somewhat similar to backing up a vehicle with an attached trailer -- you have to turn the steering wheel to the left to get the trailer to move right, which is decidedly non-intuitive."

The Visual Servoing Advantage

To simplify user control, the Georgia Tech team turned to visual servoing (a term synonymous with visual activation). Visual servoing has been studied for years as a way to use video cameras to help robots re-orient themselves within a structured environment such as an assembly line.

Traditional visual servoing is calibrated, meaning that position information generated by a video camera can be transformed into data meaningful to the robot. Using these data, the robot can adjust itself to stay in a correct spatial relationship with target objects.

"Say a conveyor line is accidently moved a few millimeters," Hu said. "A robot with a calibrated visual servoing capability can automatically detect the movement using the video image and a fixed reference point, and then readjust to compensate."

But visual servoing offers additional possibilities. The research team -- which includes Hu, associate professor Harvey Lipkin of the School of Mechanical Engineering, graduate student Matthew Marshall, GTRI research engineer Michael Matthews and GTRI principal research engineer Gary McMurray -- has adapted visual-servoing technology in ways that facilitate human control of remote robots.

The new technique takes advantage of both calibrated and uncalibrated techniques. A calibrated 3-D "time of flight" camera is mounted on the robot -- typically at the end of a robotic arm, in a gripping device called an end-effector. This approach is sometimes called an eye-in-hand system, because of the camera's location in the robot's "hand."

The camera utilizes an active sensor that detects depth data, allowing it to send back 3-D coordinates that pinpoint the end-effector's spatial location. At the same time, the eye-in-hand camera also supplies a standard, uncalibrated 2-D grayscale video image to the operator's monitor.

The result is that the operator, without seeing the robot, now has a robot's-eye view of the target. Watching this image in a monitor, an operator can visually guide the robot using a gamepad, in a manner somewhat reminiscent of a first-person 3-D video game.

In addition, visual-servoing technology now automatically actuates all the joints needed to complete whatever action the user indicates on the gamepad -- rather than the user having to manipulate those joints one by one. In the background, the Georgia Tech system performs the complex computation needed to coordinate the monitor image, the 3-D camera information, the robot's spatial position and the user's gamepad commands.

Testing System Usability

"The guidance process is now very intuitive -- pressing 'left' on the gamepad will actuate all the requisite robot joints to effect a leftward displacement," Hu said. "What's more, the robot could be upside down and the controls will still respond in the same intuitive way -- left is still left and right is still right."

To judge system usability, the Georgia Tech research team recently conducted trials to test whether the visual-servoing approach enabled faster task-completion times. Using a gamepad that controls an articulated-arm robot with six degrees of freedom, subjects performed four tests: they used visual-servoing guidance as well as conventional joint-based guidance, in both line-of-sight and camera-view modes.

In the line-of-sight test, volunteer participants using visual-servoing guidance averaged task-completion times that were 15 percent faster than when they used joint-based guidance. However, in camera-view mode, participants using visual-servoing guidance averaged 227 percent faster results than with the joint-based technique.

Hu noted that the visual-servoing system used in this test scenario was only one of numerous possible applications of the technology. The research team's plans include testing a mobile platform with a VS-guided robotic arm mounted on it. Also underway is a proof-of-concept effort that incorporates visual-servoing control into a low-cost, consumer-level robot.

"Our ultimate goal is to develop a generic, uncalibrated control framework that is able to use image data to guide many different kinds of robots," he said.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Georgia Institute of Technology, Research Communications, via Newswise. The original article was written by Rick Robinson.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/matter_energy/technology/~3/NZLhOEs2-Q4/120925142551.htm

tcu football westminster bonnaroo 2012 lineup twisted metal sea lion si swimsuit 2012 westminster dog show

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

Cancer drug mark-ups bring in big money for N.C. nonprofit ...

? The (Raleigh) News & Observer

Large nonprofit hospitals in North Carolina are dramatically inflating prices on chemotherapy drugs at a time when they are cornering more of the market on cancer care, an investigation by the Observer and The News & Observer of Raleigh has found.

The newspapers found hospitals are routinely marking up prices on cancer drugs by two to 10 times over cost. Some markups are far higher.

It?s happening as hospitals increasingly buy the practices of independent oncologists, then charge more ? sometimes much more ? for the same chemotherapy in the same office.

Asked about the findings, hospital officials said they are relying on a longtime practice of charging more for some services to make up for losses in others. Hospitals have a name for this: cost-shifting.

?The drug itself may just be the vehicle for charging for the services that are provided (elsewhere),? said Joe Piemont, president of Carolinas HealthCare System, the $7 billion chain that owns many of the region?s hospitals. ?We make literally thousands of trades to have it balance.?

The rising price of cancer treatment has financially devastated many families, while driving up insurance costs and causing some patients to put off needed treatments.

?If you have enough money or good enough insurance, it may not be an issue for you,? said Donna Hopkins, CEO of Dynamic Medical Solutions, a company that audits medical bills. ?If you?re somebody who doesn?t have that, it can be a death sentence.?

After examining some chemotherapy bills collected by the Observer, Hopkins called the markups ?outrageous.?

Some of the largest markups are made by nonprofit hospital chains that generate millions of dollars of profit each year and have billions in reserves.

It?s a mystery to the public how hospitals set their charges. But the newspapers obtained and analyzed a private database with information on more than 5,000 chemotherapy claims to get insight into pricing for cancer patients, a group that faces some of the nation?s highest medical bills.

The drug data, along with scores of interviews, help explain why hospitals have become so expensive ? and why health care spending now makes up 18 percent of the national economy.

Among the markups found:

? Levine Cancer Institute, owned by Charlotte-based Carolinas HealthCare, this year collected nearly $4,500 for a 240-milligram dose of irinotecan, a drug used to treat people with colon or rectal cancer. The average sales price for that amount of the drug: less than $60.

? Carolinas Medical Center-NorthEast in Concord was paid about $19,000 for a one-gram dose of rituximab, used to treat lymphoma and leukemia. That was roughly three times the average sales price.

? Forsyth Medical Center in Winston-Salem, owned by Novant Health, collected about $680 for 50 milligrams of cisplatin. The markup: more than 50 times the average sales price.

Such markups are hidden from patients.

Charlotte native Chuck Moore, the patient in the Forsyth case, got nine weeks of chemotherapy for cancer at the base of his tongue in 2008 and 2009. Though he had good health insurance, he still paid about $15,000.

When a reporter told him the average sales price of the drugs he?d received, he questioned the hospital?s charges.

?I?ve never had a business where I could get a markup like that,? said Moore, an assembly plant supervisor now living near Atlanta. ?It seems almost predatory.?

Costlier, not better

Until recently, those who needed chemotherapy had more alternatives. They could go to the offices of oncologists who weren?t employed by hospitals.

Increasingly, however, private oncologists are under financial pressure to sell their businesses to hospitals. When they do, hospitals often charge more.

In a review of claims for seven cancer drugs, the newspapers found that charges for all but one drug were significantly higher at hospitals and hospital-owned clinics ? usually more than 45 percent higher.

Levine Cancer Institute, for instance, charges about $106 for each unit of Aloxi, the anti-nausea drug. But at Carolina Oncology Specialists, an independent clinic in Hickory, the charge is just $50.

Insurers have found similar patterns.

At the newspapers? request, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, the state?s largest health insurer, examined data from thousands of 2011 chemotherapy claims and found that hospital-owned facilities in the state tend to be paid 50 to 150 percent more for cancer drugs than independent oncologists.

A recent study by Avalere Health, a consulting firm, found similar disparities nationally. Chemotherapy costs 24 percent more in an outpatient hospital setting than in a doctor?s office, the study concluded.

Dr. Ira Klein, assistant to the chief medical officer at Aetna insurance company, said he believes the acquisitions of oncology practices by hospitals have increased costs without improving the quality of care.

?We?re essentially enriching people and getting nothing for it,? he said. ?And there are higher premiums every year.?

Shifting the costs

Hospital officials defend their pricing.

Unlike many independent clinics, they say, hospitals suffer losses from treating patients without insurance and patients covered by Medicaid, the government program for the poor and disabled. Some independent oncologists acknowledge that they often refer such patients to hospitals.

Hospital officials say they provide counseling and many other cancer services that insurers don?t cover.

Officials for Carolinas HealthCare and Novant, which runs four Mecklenburg County hospitals, emphasize that they provide free care to many financially needy cancer patients.

Carolinas Medical Center spent about 5.5 percent of its budget on charity care in 2010. Presbyterian Hospital spent about 5 percent.

Piemont, of Carolinas HealthCare, said charges for chemotherapy drugs may be used to cover costs of other money-losing services, such as the emergency department, which treats a high number of uninsured patients.

?We cannot be compared to (an independent doctor) who can just overtly select who they see,? Piemont said. ?We take everybody. That requires cost-shifting that is so emblematic of this industry.?

Novant spokeswoman Kati Everett pointed to shortcomings in the Avalere study, noting that hospital patients tend to be sicker than those treated in doctors? offices. Comparing prices at hospitals versus doctor?s offices doesn?t provide an accurate picture, she argued.

Like most hospitals, those owned by Carolinas HealthCare and Novant are nonprofits, a designation that provides them substantial tax breaks. In exchange, they are expected to provide charity care and other benefits to their communities.

Hospitals will likely face fewer unpaid bills under the federal Affordable Care Act. That?s because the law, scheduled to become fully effective in 2014, requires millions of people to buy health insurance. At the same time, hospitals will likely face cuts in government reimbursement for care.

Neither hospital system answered questions about how much they?ve spent on chemotherapy drugs in recent years, and how much revenue those drugs generated.

But Everett said Novant lost money on outpatient chemotherapy infusion last year.

It?s understandable why many cancer drugs don?t come cheap, according to those who make and administer them. Drug companies must cover research and development costs. Hospitals have to cover overhead.

The N.C. Hospital Association said the costs of handling and preparing cancer drugs ?far exceed those required for most other medications.?

?Medicines that treat cancer are toxic, dangerous chemicals that demand the highest levels of trained personnel, specialized equipment and facilities,? the association said.

Community oncologists say they use the same toxic drugs in their practices at a much lower price.

And some experts contend that hospitals don?t need to inflate prices so dramatically.

Gerard Anderson, who heads the Johns Hopkins Center for Hospital Finance, thinks hospitals mark up charges on cancer drugs more than most other drugs and supplies. One reason, he suspects, is that patients are ?not inclined to do comparison shopping in a life-or-death situation.?

Gaining leverage on price

Size has given hospitals major advantages.

An Observer investigation in April showed how hospital consolidation has led to higher prices. When hospitals merge into large systems, they gain leverage to negotiate higher payments from private insurers.

While insurers might be willing to exclude a small clinic from their networks, they are loath to lose the hospital chains that have come to dominate many markets.

That has helped some North Carolina hospital chains evolve into profitable, fast-growing giants. At Carolinas HealthCare, the nation?s second-largest public hospital system, the average annual profit has exceeded $300 million over the past three years. The chain has built up more than $2 billion in investments and owns more than $1 billion in property.

Novant had about $1.6 billion in cash and investments in 2010 ? a threefold increase over the decade.

Carolinas HealthCare?s size and scope have increased the community?s access to quality health care, system officials say. With the creation of Levine Cancer Institute in 2010, the hospital system has recruited specialists from respected institutions such as the Cleveland Clinic and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Size gives hospitals another edge, allowing them to save money when they purchase drugs in bulk.

And more than 40 North Carolina hospitals ? including Carolinas Medical Center and Presbyterian Hospital ? are able to obtain deep discounts on outpatient drugs under the federal 340B program, which requires drug manufacturers to provide price breaks to hospitals that treat large numbers of financially needy patients.

Although Congress set up the program to offset the cost of treating Medicaid patients, hospitals can buy discounted drugs for all outpatients, including those with private insurance.

?There is no requirement to pass the savings on to patients, and they don?t,? said Dr. John Peterson, who practiced as a private oncologist in Sanford for 18 years before moving to Dartmouth College last year. ?These hospitals are driving out the private practices, and they?re becoming the Wal-Mart of health care, squashing the competition, but without the low prices.?

Costs jeopardize lives

Cancer costs more per patient, on average, than any other medical condition.

In North Carolina, Blue Cross and Blue Shield said the cost of cancer drugs for members younger than 65 rose from $178 million in 2009 to $211 million last year.

New drugs have given hope to many cancer patients. But some of those drugs come with annual price tags that rival those of a small home.

Treating a cancer patient with Avastin, for instance, costs about $90,000 a year, doctors say.

Much of the bill is picked up by employers and their workers, who pay ever-increasing sums for insurance and other costs.

But no one feels the financial pain more than patients. In a 2010 survey commissioned by the American Cancer Society, 21 percent of people younger than 65 undergoing cancer treatment said they had used up all or most of their savings. And 19 percent said they or their family members had put off getting a recommended cancer test or treatment because of cost.

Dr. Otis Brawley, the society?s chief medical officer, has seen the consequences.

When Brawley headed the cancer center at Emory University in Atlanta from 2001 to 2007, he regularly treated patients who waited too long to get treatment ? often because of financial concerns.

?Many folks put off managing their problems until it?s so, so bad, they have to come into the emergency room,? he said.

Too often, Brawley said, such delays cost patients their lives. Patients who initially suffered from treatable colon cancer, for instance, sometimes delayed seeking treatment until the malignancy spread to the liver and became incurable.

Doctors in North Carolina see some patients making similar choices.

?A lot of patients are forgoing care,? said Dr. David Eagle, of Huntersville, who is president of the Community Oncology Alliance, a national nonprofit group dedicated to community cancer care. Marge Beazley, who manages an oncology practice in Western North Carolina, said some underinsured patients wind up with more than $50,000 in annual out-of-pocket expenses. Others, she said, choose not to be treated because of the cost.

?Those are the ones that break your heart,? she said.

?Oh my God?

When Carol Fleming of Huntersville was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2008, her husband?s job in Saudi Arabia provided health insurance.

But he died of leukemia in 2010. Ten days later, her insurance was canceled. Within a month, the bills for her chemotherapy and related services had topped $65,000.

She recalls opening her first bill and saying: ?Oh my God. Oh my God.?

?I remember thinking, ?I?m in the middle of my battle. How many more treatments am I going to need?? I was petrified.?

Presbyterian Huntersville provided excellent care, along with help with some of her bills, said Fleming, a former CIA agent. She exhausted her savings paying some of the rest.

Now she?s living in a small apartment, dependent on government assistance. It?s a far cry from her life in Saudi Arabia, when she lived in a six-bedroom house with marble floors.

?This has happened to me,? she said. ?It can happen to anybody.?

Database editor David Raynor contributed.

Source: http://www.sunherald.com/2012/09/24/4204286/cancer-drug-mark-ups-bring-in.html

augusta national blake griffin pau gasol marlins park marbury v. madison 2013 lincoln mkz burger king mary j blige

Genea-Musings: The Problem with FamilySearch Family Tree

Genea-Musings: The Problem with FamilySearch Family Tree

The Problem with FamilySearch Family Tree

I posted back in July about trying to get the Benjamin Seaver (1791-1825) family correct in FamilySearch Family Tree (see?Sorting Out Benjamin Seaver (1791-1825) on?FamilySearch?Family?Tree?and?Getting Benjamin Seaver (1791-1825) Right on?FamilySearch?Family?Tree).

It was very difficult to figure out how to, and then execute the process, to get the right parents, the right spouse, and the right children for Benjamin Seaver. ?There were multiple sets of parents, spouses and children for this one person who, from my research, had one set of parents, one spouse, and one set of four children.

I've been going through some of my families on FamilySearch Family Tree, trying to clean them up as best I can, but it seems to take a long time. ?The hope is that FamilySearch will come up with an easier way to do this - and I beta tested one month ago the "Combine Persons" feature that has not yet been released. ?That worked, and so I decided to wait to do any more cleanup until that feature was released.

I thought that it might be educational to others thinking about using the FamilySearch Family Tree to see what the basic problem is. ?My definition of the problem is that: "There is all of this data for a single person in the Family Tree from undocumented sources - both from Ancestral File trees submitted by LDS members, and extracted data submitted to the International Genealogical Index."

Here is one example - my 7th great-grandfather, Joseph Seaver (1672-1754) of Massachusetts (4 contiguous screens).






As you can see, there are 7 alternate names, ten children, two extra marriages, and four parental families for Joseph Seaver. ?He actually had 6 children, one spouse, and one set of parents. Oh, the name of his father is wrong too! ?This is typical for persons with multiple submissions in Ancestral File and the IGI. ?However, some of the alternate names were used in the records.

I have done some cleanup on the items above, as you can see in the "Latest Changes" box in the first screen above. ?I may do some more and try to measure how long it takes to do this task so that I can compare it later when the FSFT "Combine Persons" feature works well.

I thought that I would try to add some source citations before I deleted the alternate names, the extra marriages and the extra parents. ?However, I decided not to do that until a Source citation synchronization is available though RootsMagic 5 (I'm assuming (hoping!) that Bruce is working on this...) because of the time it takes to do even a copy and paste process in the FSFT Source citations. ?I could use the My SourceBox feature on FamilySearch to add sources, but I haven't done that yet for Joseph Seaver.

What isn't shown in the list above are all of the bits of data for each Fact. ?Here is the screen for the Marriage data for Joseph Seaver and Mary Read (2 screens):




There are 15 marriage entries on the list. ?The correct date, according to the Sudbury, Massachusetts vital record book (page 265), for the marriage of Joseph Severs and Mary Reed is 13 October 170[torn]: ?



It is certainly either 13 October 1700 or 1701, since their first child was born on 29 October 1702. I think that it's probably 13 October 1700. ?Unfortunately, the Sudbury births, marriages and deaths are not yet available in the Massachusetts Town Records on Ancestry.com; they might enable researchers to narrow down the year, even though the page is likely torn.

In the list of marriage dates in FamilySearch Family Tree, some of the entries give the year as "0170" due to the lack of a fourth number for the year. ?When I clean up this person's information, I will have to delete all of the wrong ones above and make sure that I source the correct date. ?I'm wondering how I should add the date - should I say 13 October 1700 or 1701? ?

The URL for this post is: ?http://www.geneamusings.com/2012/09/the-problem-with-familysearch-family.html

Copyright (c) 2012, Randall J. Seaver

Source: http://www.geneamusings.com/2012/09/the-problem-with-familysearch-family.html

jordans prometheus movie posterior adam lambert arrested barkley beltran space ball

Monday, 24 September 2012

Gilbert Melendez injury causes Strikeforce to cancel Saturday?s card

Strikeforce lightweight champion Gilbert Melendez was hit with an injury just a week before he was scheduled to fight Pat Healy. He had to withdraw from the fight. Without Healy-Melendez, Showtime decided not to air the card. Without Showtime, Strikeforce canceled the event.

"When Showtime informed us that it would not be airing the event, we made the difficult decision to cancel Saturday's card in Sacramento," Strikeforce CEO Scott Coker said via press release. "Without a television partner, we simply could not move forward with this event. We wish Gilbert a speedy recovery and will work diligently and quickly to reschedule the fighters affected by this news on upcoming cards."

This is the second major injury to hit Strikeforce recently. UFC heavyweight Frank Mir pulled out of his Nov. 3 bout with Strikeforce heavyweight grand prix champ Daniel Cormier with an injury.

Healy told Bloody Elbow Radio that he was told he would not be fighting again until Melendez is healthy, and that he wasn't given the option to fight someone else.

"I'm like in a daze, still. I have to think about, if Gil's going to be out six months and I have to wait the whole time, I have to start making some plans to make money right now so I'm not in a situation where I have to make money right before training for a fight," Healy said.

Outside of Melendez Healy, Saturday's card featured:

Guto Inocente vs. Gian Villante
Caros Fodor vs. Josh Thomson
Adriano Martins vs. Isaac Vallie-Flagg
Quinn Mulhern vs. Jorge Santiago
Jorge Gurgel vs. Mizuto Hirota
Amanda Nunes vs. Cat Zingano
Mike Kyle vs. Dion Staring
Nah-Shon Burrell vs. Yuri Villefort
Michael Bravo vs. Estevan Payan

Those fighters didn't create enough firepower for Showtime. Perhaps a re-airing of the "Weeds" season finale will be enough for the network instead of a live sporting event.

This creates a problem for the Strikeforce fighters on the card. One of the complaints heard most often from Strikeforce fighters is that they don't fight enough. In 2012, Strikeforce has held just five fight events. With such infrequency, fighters have few chances to fight and make money from their fight purse and sponsors.

Outside the main event, Strikeforce has nine fights place. Though there is room on the Nov. 3 card, it won't be enough to accommodate every fighter. Plus, the fighters thought they were getting paid on Sept. 29, and best case scenario has them getting paid a month from now. Fighting is never an easy way to make a living, but cancelling cards in the last minute makes the job much harder.

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mma-cagewriter/gilbert-melendez-injury-causes-strikeforce-cancel-saturday-card-123304008--mma.html

jim jones tony stewart kurt busch kurt busch nba dunk contest 2012 act of valor woody guthrie

Character Relations

This topic is an Out Of Character part of the roleplay, ?Even Angels?. Anything posted here will also show up there.

Topic Tags:

Forum for completely Out of Character (OOC) discussion, based around whatever is happening In Character (IC). Discuss plans, storylines, and events; Recruit for your roleplaying game, or find a GM for your playergroup.
Hello, All! Because it is in the middle of the night and I'm completely bored, I decided to create a Relationship sheet to see what the characters think of one another. Keep in mind, you can only fill out the characters that your character knows. Have fun, and be creative!
Code: Select all
[center][font=Choose font][color=choose color][size=400][u]NAME HERE[/u][/size][/color]
[color=choose color][size=130]PERSONALITY SUMMARY[/size][/color][/font][/center]

[right][img]ANIME IMAGE LINK HERE[/img][/right]
[font=choose font][color=choose color][size=150][u]-Morgan:[/u][/size][/color][/font]

[font=choose font][color=choose color][size=150][u]-Jaoel:[/u][/size][/color][/font]

[font=choose font][color=choose color][size=150][u]-Ariel:[/u][/size][/color][/font]

[font=choose font][color=choose color][size=150][u]-Asmodeus:[/u][/size][/color][/font]

[font=choose font][color=choose color][size=150][u]-Arcelia Luce Innocenti:[/u][/size][/color][/font]

[font=choose font][color=choose color][size=150][u]-Echo Maddox:[/u][/size][/color][/font]

[font=choose font][color=choose color][size=150][u]-Elodie Miller:[/u][/size][/color][/font]

User avatar
TwiliXDragon
Member for 2 years



Post a reply

RolePlayGateway is a site built by a couple roleplayers who wanted to give a little something back to the roleplay community. The site has no intention of earning any profit, and is paid for out of their own pockets.

If you appreciate what they do, feel free to donate your spare change to help feed them on the weekends. After selecting the amount you want to donate from the menu, you can continue by clicking on PayPal logo.

Who is online

Registered users: 1Toklo1*, AceofSpade, Ahri*, Akantha, all.smiles, amilee_lee*, Angelfire*, Aradia, Archailist*, Ar?te*, Bashie L. Craft, Beach-Born-Boy, bellelaine, Blazewind*, BOO!*, CaesarTheSeventh*, CelticCat*, cheater0611*, cmpuncle, Colonel_Masters, CussingChild*, Dante Angelico*, Dark Star*, DeadlyxSunshine, delfiler, dig17, Digital_Muse*, digs*, Dmitrij Rosha, Dreamalot106, EKRonnie, emotionless, EpicBacon*, Erik7622*, evilfang, Forevveru, Froggiepril, Gamer_Templar, Gasmask*, Gohon*, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Guardian Angel, Hazezon, HereMeNow, Horseygirl, Hydrall, IridescentMoon, Isladhiel L?thien, jackrules158*, Jadeling Hawkins*, Kai, Kapento, koalaking555, Konstantein, Lady Inali*, Lambie*, Legate*, Light_of_the_Fallen*, Little Fox*, Lobos, Lotsalove052*, Lovely ?*, lovelyzombie*, Lufia*, macheteshark, Mad?Hatter*, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mathew Littlepaw, MaxStokes*, Meesha*, Mela, Memento-Mori*, Merchant, Midnightclub*, Miss_Dreamer*, Monochrome*, MSNbot Media, nicolbaka*, NotSoHeartless*, Oblivian*, Odysseus*, Patcharoo*, peachyme123, PirateofPie*, PreachingLegionary, Princess Awinita*, Psyche, Psychroma, raindrops_autumn*, Roku Mushabuki*, RoseAmedori*, Ruby Piranha*, Rulke*, Saikua*, Saint Crash*, sasha-jen*, Saxious*, ScarnyLuv, Script*, Secrets, Sephiroth89*, ShadowsoftheNine*, Shi-chan, shmband*, shrubvera, Snow*, Sonicx00*, Sorella, souloe*, Stella11, StrobeLight, SunniBunny*, Susie Maddy Daison, Sweet Angel Jocelyn*, Taidine, Taroo, Tash, TechGorilla*, TemplarWarden*, The Illusionist*, The*Lucky*Teacup*, TheFinalOne, Thorait*, Thundera*, tigerking1292, tornadofan2*, True Grave*, TRUE-ASSASSIN, Uncertainly*, Valkyrieknight*, Vestiline*, ViceVersus, VitaminHeart*, WadeJackel*, Wake, WhySoSerious?*, WindOnFire*, XavierDantius32*, XxEvil1xX*, Yahoo [Bot], yaria, YoureStillAnInnocent*, ZacharyTC*

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RolePlayGateway/~3/_rArFnzxXjg/viewtopic.php

tagged weather radar Heptathlon London 2012 shot put London 2012 Track And Field Jordyn Wieber michael phelps

Wednesday, 19 September 2012

Obama allies continue to push secret Romney video

WASHINGTON (AP) ? President Barack Obama's campaign allies continued to push out an unauthorized video of rival Mitt Romney dismissing the half of Americans who don't pay income taxes, while the Republican nominee tried to turn the campaign disruption into a debate over the role of government in family finances.

"My course for the American economy will encourage private investment and personal freedom," Romney wrote in an op-ed essay in Wednesday's USA Today. "Instead of creating a web of dependency, I will pursue policies that grow our economy and lift Americans out of poverty."

It remains to be seen whether Romney's remarks at a private fundraiser, captured on hidden camera, would shake loose a dead heat that's persisted in the presidential campaign for months. An Associated Press-GfK poll out Wednesday shows an improvement in Obama's job approval rating and confidence in the country's direction, but the race is a dead heat among those most likely to vote.

Romney's USA Today essay avoided mention of the claim he makes on the video that nearly half of Americans believe they are victims and entitled to a range of government support and that as a candidate, he doesn't feel a need to worry about them. His running mate, Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, told KRNV-TV in Reno, Nev., that Romney "was obviously inarticulate in making this point" that government dependency and economic stagnation have risen under Obama.

Obama, appearing Tuesday on CBS' "Late Show with David Letterman," rejected the notion that many Americans feel they are victims. "One thing I've learned as president is that you represent the entire country," he said.

A super political action committee supporting Obama was more pointed in the first television advertisement using Romney's words, released Wednesday morning and scheduled to run in battlegrounds Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin.

The ad includes video of Romney saying, "I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility." An announcer interjects, "And Mitt Romney will never convince us he's on our side."

With early and absentee voting beginning in a number of states, both sides hoped to lock in votes long before Election Day. The first of three presidential debates is scheduled for Oct. 3, and the two camps were looking to secure any edge as Obama's post-convention polling advantage seemed to be ebbing. Obama planned a rare full day at the White House Wednesday, including a private meeting with Myanmar democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi; Romney scheduled a fundraiser in Atlanta and two appearances in Miami, including a candidate forum with the Spanish-language TV network Univision.

The Romney campaign continued to respond to the criticism of his fundraiser remarks Wednesday by pointing out videotaped comments Obama made in 1998 as evidence he favored government redistribution of wealth. An Illinois state senator at the time, Obama said he believes in redistribution "at least to a certain level to make sure everybody's got a shot."

"I know some believe that government should take from some to give to the others," Romney said in an interview Tuesday on Fox News Channel. "I think the president makes it clear in the tape that was released today that that's what he believes. I think that's an entirely foreign concept. I believe America was built on the principle of government caring for those in need, but getting out of the way and allowing free people to pursue their dreams."

But in his Fox interview, Romney continued to cast a segment of the country as unable to rally around his tax-cutting message.

"I recognize that those people who are not paying income tax are going to say, 'Gosh, this provision that Mitt keeps talking about lowering income taxes, that's not going to be real attractive to them,'" Romney said. "And those that are dependent upon government and those that think government's job is to redistribute, I'm not going to get them."

Some Republicans distanced themselves from their party's nominee.

"I disagree with Governor Romney's insinuation that 47 percent of Americans believe they are victims who must depend on the government for their care," Linda McMahon, the Republican candidate for a Senate seat in Connecticut, said in a statement posted to her website.

Sen. Scott Brown, facing a tough re-election race in heavily Democratic Massachusetts, said of Romney's comments, "That's not the way I view the world."

And New Mexico's Republican governor, Susana Martinez, noted in reaction to Romney's remarks that many in New Mexico live at or below the poverty level, and "that safety net is a good thing."

On Wednesday, the Romney campaign released two television ads accusing the Obama administration of conducting a "war on coal." The ads come one day after Virginia-based Alpha Natural Resources disclosed that it is closing mines in Virginia, West Virginia and Pennsylvania and eliminating 1,200 jobs. Alpha CEO Kevin Crutchfield blamed the shutdowns, in part, on "a regulatory environment that's aggressively aimed at constraining the use of coal."

___

Follow Jim Kuhnhenn at http://twitter.com/jkuhnhenn

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/obama-allies-continue-push-secret-romney-video-134518761--election.html

ndamukong suh aptera aptera national defense authorization act national defense authorization act seven days in utopia seven days in utopia

Chicago students return to class as strike ends


Essential News from The Associated Press

? ?Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2012-09-19-Chicago%20Schools-Strike/id-70cef5c0348941ca87b508c5da372c4c

fafsa branson missouri davy jones dead monkees last train to clarksville tim tebow taylor swift post grad

Three Massachusetts Polls Show Obama Firmly Ahead in Bay State

{ttle}

{cptn}","template_name":"ss_thmb_play_ttle","i18n":{"end_of_gallery_header":"End of Gallery","end_of_gallery_next":"View Again"},"metadata":{"pagination":"{firstVisible} - {lastVisible} of {numItems}","ult":{"spaceid":"2022398630","sec":""}}},{"id": "hcm-carousel-1689939053", "dataManager": C.dmgr, "mediator": C.mdtr, "group_name":"hcm-carousel-1689939053", "track_item_selected":1,"tracking":{ "spaceid" : "2022398630", "events" : { "click" : { "any" : { "yui-carousel-prev" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"prev","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } }, "yui-carousel-next" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"next","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // no more pages, don't beacon again // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } } } } } } })); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings = '"projectId": "10001256862979", "documentName": "", "documentGroup": "", "ywaColo" : "vscale3", "spaceId" : "2022398630" ,"customFields" : { "12" : "classic", "13" : "story" }'; Y.Media.YWA.init(Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {(function() { try{ if (Math.floor(Math.random()*10) == 1) { var loc = window.location, decoded = decodeURI(loc.pathname), encoded = encodeURI(decoded), uri = loc.protocol + "//" + loc.host + encoded + ((loc.search.length > 0) ? loc.search + '&' : '?') + "_cacheable=1", xmlhttp; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); else xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); xmlhttp.open("GET",uri,true); xmlhttp.send(); } }catch(e){} })(); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {if(document.onclick===YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.newClick){document.onclick=YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.oldClick;} }); }); });

Japan Airlines up slightly in Tokyo trading debut

A Japan Airlines passenger checks in at Tokyo's Haneda Airport in Tokyo Monday, Sept. 10, 2012. Japan Airlines Co. is raising 663 billion yen ($8.5 billion) in its initial public offering, pricing its shares at the top of its range at 3,790 yen ($48) ? the world's second biggest IPO this year after Facebook. (AP Photo/Koji Sasahara)

A Japan Airlines passenger checks in at Tokyo's Haneda Airport in Tokyo Monday, Sept. 10, 2012. Japan Airlines Co. is raising 663 billion yen ($8.5 billion) in its initial public offering, pricing its shares at the top of its range at 3,790 yen ($48) ? the world's second biggest IPO this year after Facebook. (AP Photo/Koji Sasahara)

Japan Airlines passenger planes park on the tarmac of Tokyo's Haneda Airport in Tokyo, Monday, Sept. 10, 2012. Japan Airlines Co. is raising 663 billion yen ($8.5 billion) in its initial public offering, pricing its shares at the top of its range at 3,790 yen ($48) ? the world's second biggest IPO this year after Facebook. (AP Photo/Koji Sasahara)

(AP) ? Japan Airlines Co. capped an $8.5 billion initial public offering, the biggest this year after Facebook's, with a modest return to the Tokyo Stock Exchange: Its share price rose only 1 percent in the first day of trading.

The shares closed at 3,830 yen ($48.69), barely above their 3,790 yen IPO price, after briefly topping 3,900 yen shortly after trading opened.

The carrier, also known as JAL, was delisted after it went bankrupt in 2010 but has since carried out cost cuts and restructured to return to solid profitability. Its 663 billion yen ($8.5 billion) IPO nearly doubled the 350 billion yen that went into its government-backed bailout.

"The relisting of our stock is only the starting line for our departure," the company's president Yoshiharu Ueki told reporters, vowing to return the support the airline had received by ensuring good service, safety and enhancing the company's value for its investors.

Though the IPO was oversubscribed and pre-debut gray market trading levels reportedly exceeded 4,000 yen ($50) a share, investor enthusiasm may have been tempered by previous losses and concern that JAL's recovery may not be sustainable given fierce competition from regional carriers.

"We have to see how its recovery is progressing," Yuichiro Hata, the transport minister, said of JAL's trading debut. "Ensuring safety and reliability is the top priority, and we will provide guidance as needed."

JAL's 2.32 trillion yen ($29.4 billion) default was the biggest ever by a Japanese non-financial institution. The 175 million shares included in the IPO were only those held by the Enterprise Turnaround Initiative Corporation of Japan, which is the government-backed entity put in charge of the airline's bailout and restructuring.

Its shares in the carrier accounted for 96.5 percent, with the remaining 3.5 percent still held by existing shareholders.

Once Japan's flagship carrier and a national icon known for courteous service and punctuality, JAL symbolized the country's economic rise and then its stagnation as it struggled with a bloated workforce, unpopular routes and safety lapses.

Kazuo Inamori, one of Japan's most celebrated entrepreneurs as founder of both ceramics maker Kyocera Corp. and mobile carrier KDDI Corp., oversaw the airline's restructuring after it applied for bankruptcy after racking up mountains of debt..

Since its default, JAL has trimmed a third of its payroll, investing in low-cost carriers, retiring its big jets in favor of smaller ones suitable for regional hauls and changing its routes to emphasize international routes rather than sluggish domestic ones.

"The challenge now is ensure a fair and equal opportunity for all Japanese carriers to be successful," Tony Tyler, director general and CEO of the International Air Transport Association, said Wednesday in comments to the American Chamber of Commerce.

The IATA has been lobbying for Japan to lower high costs for airlines at the country's airports.

JAL's comeback has drawn criticism that the government-backed bailout might have been unfair to its rival carrier in Japan, All Nippon Airways, which made gains when JAL was struggling.

Japan Airlines posted a profit 187 billion yen ($2.4 billion) profit for the fiscal year ended March 2012, while All Nippon Airways recorded a 28 billion yen ($356 million) profit for the fiscal year through March 2012.

The industry remains highly competitive, and Japanese increasingly are no longer so loyal as they used to be to national carriers. Meanwhile, budget airlines and Chinese carriers with significantly lower cost bases are challenging JAL and ANA on both domestic and international routes the CAPA - Center for Aviation, said in a recent report.

It praised JAL's decision to shift its focus to overseas markets.

"Its plan is a solid start, and remarkable when considering the inefficiencies in the carrier at the start of the decade," it said.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/f70471f764144b2fab526d39972d37b3/Article_2012-09-19-JAL%20IPO/id-588de1bb35d447c0a1f386d18470542c

What Is Labor Day jersey shore Pasquale Rotella Michael Clark Duncan michael jackson courtney stodden Ncaa Football Scores

Say hello to a new way to sell your cellphone

23 hrs.

Been thinking of?upgrading to a new cellphone? You may be in luck. Almost 150 new, artificially intelligent kiosks that buy back people's old cellphones have been installed in malls in several U.S. states. Users get cash for their phones, while the unwanted devices get a second life, which keeps the phones' toxic metals out of landfills.?

EcoATM founder Mark Bowles came up with the idea after reading that only three percent of people worldwide have ever recycled a cellphone, he told InnovationNewsDaily. "I thought about my own case. Why didn't I do it?" he said. "I didn't know where to do it and I didn't have an incentive."?

EcoATM aims to answer both problems by putting recycling kiosks "in people's normal paths" and by giving people an alluring reward: "Immediate cash, on the spot," Bowles said.

To use an ecoATM machine, users place their unwanted devices on the machine's scanner. EcoATMs deploy computer vision and artificial intelligence to recognize more than 4,000 makes and models of phones, chargers and other accessories. The machines also assess damage to the devices, sorting them into one of eight categories of conditions. [Do-It-Yourself Cat Door Recognizes Your Feline]

From there, the computer system estimates a value for the device. Possible payouts range from $1 to $250, according to the ecoATM website. Users who want to go through with the trade choose either cash or store credit, or donate the value to one of several charities.?

On the other end of the trade, ecoATM has relationships with international companies that have pre-bid on phones in different conditions. Those partners resell phones in good condition, mostly to American customers, Bowles said. Three-quarters of the phones ecoATM processes are reused, according to the company. The other 25 percent are recycled for their precious metals and electronic components.

"The ecoATM project is an extremely innovative way to motivate the public with an incentive to do the right thing with discarded electronics, both socially and environmentally," Glenn Larsen, an officer who oversees National Science Foundation grants to ecoATM,?said in a statement.?The foundation has supported ecoATM with two grants for small businesses. EcoATM is otherwise funded by private investors.?

Getting a computer program to distinguish between phones was no easy feat, Bowles said. "A lot of these phones are just a dark sheet of glass that's a rectangle," he said. In addition, blemishes to the phones' screens, such as smudgy fingerprints and cracked glass, will look similar to a computer program, even though they mean very different things for the valuation of the phone, he explained.

To make its judgments, the ecoATM kiosk subjects each phone to a series of visual tests, lighting the phone in different ways. It also asks users to plug in their phones for an electronic evaluation, after automatically offering users the correct plug.

EcoATM's computer algorithms accurately recognize phone models and classify damage 97.5 percent of the time, according to the National Science Foundation. The algorithms are able to learn from mistakes, so that number may improve in the future. The company plans to continue researching how to improve accuracy.?

EcoATM's?kiosk locator?lists almost 150 locations in Washington, California, Colorado, Texas, Georgia and on the East Coast. The company plans to have 300 machines in place by the end of the year.

Follow InnovationNewsDaily on Twitter @News_Innovation, or on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 InnovationNewsDaily, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/futureoftech/say-hello-new-way-sell-your-cellphone-1B5946722

bengals the stand josh mcdaniels cotton bowl wizards of waverly place cedric benson playoff schedule

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

10 Things to Know for Tuesday

FILE - This undated file photo provided by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game shows a black bear cub nicknamed Boo Boo that had been burned in a wildfire in eastern Idaho in August 2012. The cub, which had second-degree burns on all four of its paws, is improving and has been moved to a rehabilitation area in central Idaho. (AP Photo/Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Tricia Hebdon, File)

FILE - This undated file photo provided by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game shows a black bear cub nicknamed Boo Boo that had been burned in a wildfire in eastern Idaho in August 2012. The cub, which had second-degree burns on all four of its paws, is improving and has been moved to a rehabilitation area in central Idaho. (AP Photo/Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Tricia Hebdon, File)

Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney addresses the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in Los Angeles, Monday, Sept. 17, 2012. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

Your daily look at late-breaking news, upcoming events and the stories that will be talked about Tuesday:

1. ROMNEY: I SPOKE TOO HASTILY

GOP candidate says his comment on video clip that nearly half of Americans consider themselves victims was "not elegantly stated" and was "spoken off the cuff."

2. WHAT'S AT STAKE AS AFGHAN 'SURGE' WINDS DOWN

The U.S. troop increase was supposed to force the Taliban to come to the peace table, but that hasn't happened.

3. STUDY CALLS MILITARY SUBSTANCE ABUSE A 'CRISIS'

The report, requested by the Defense Department, also says Pentagon methods of dealing with the problem are out of date.

4. THE PICKET LINE PERSISTS

But striking Chicago teachers are set to meet Tuesday to discuss an offer that could end a walkout that's kept 350,000 kids out of school six days.

5. WHERE MYANMAR'S SUU KYI WILL VISIT

The Nobel laureate meets with Secretary of State Clinton on Tuesday to kick off her jam-packed 17-day U.S. tour.

6. HOW NEWSWEEK'S (hash)MUSLIMRAGE TOPIC BECAME A TRENDER

With self-mocking humor, many Muslims turned an essay on anger over the prophet film into a generally light-hearted Twitter sensation.

7. RULING TUESDAY ON KATE'S TOPLESS PHOTOS

The royal couple's lawyer says Prince William and his wife were sharing a "profoundly intimate" moment when the pictures were taken.

8. SMOKEY BEAR: THE SEQUEL

A 4-month-old cub named Boo Boo, whose paws were burned in an Idaho forest fire, is on the mend and expected to make a full recovery.

9. EIGHT CHILDREN SAVED FROM OREGON LAKE

A family rescued the kids, none of whom could swim. "A trained team would have done no better," the fire chief says.

10. OLYMPIC STAR SHAUN WHITE FACES CHARGES

The snowboarding gold medalist is accused of public intoxication and vandalism after an incident at a Nashville, Tenn., hotel.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2012-09-17-10-Things-to-Know-Tuesday/id-78df7a061c7c4670b425db6c7cb8ebcd

marilyn monroe Nathan Adrian London 2012 Synchronized Swimming London 2012 hurdles Taylor Kinney Beach Volleyball Olympics 2012 Jessica Ennis